New Form: Customer’s ITMA (Information Technology Master Agreement)

We’ve posted a new contract in the forms library — and it’s available in MS Word (no charge, as always). It’s meant to serve as a customer’s primary contract for purchasing any and all IT (other than hardware or IaaS): namely, licensed software, software-as-a-service (SaaS), and/or IT professional services. You can use it to acquire […]

5 Simple Rules for Negotiating Software and IT Contracts

Capterra’s IT Management Blog just published an article by David Tollen: 5 Simple Rules for Negotiating Software and IT Contracts. It’s a customer-focused articles, addressing five mistakes customers tend to make in their tech contracts. (Sorry vendors! Capterra’s blog mainly serves customers.) Please check it out …

New Form: Consulting Services Agreement

We’ve posted a new contract in the forms library — and it’s available to you in MS Word (no charge, as always). The new form is for professional services by a consultant. It’s friendly to the consultant, though it does give the company ownership of any IP generated on the job. It also includes confidentiality […]

New Forms for the Defense of Trade Secrets Act of 2016

We’ve just updated all the clauses and contracts at TechContracts.com to address the Defense of Trade Secrets Act of 2016 (the “DTSA”). That includes the NDA’s and the other contracts that include confidentiality clauses at the Contracts page, as well as the confidentiality-related terms in the Clauses library. (On the Contracts page, only the NDA’s […]

The Big Data Licensing Issue-Spotter

Managing and sharing big data creates technical challenges unlike anything found in traditional data-sharing relationships. But big data contracts don’t involve a whole new field of legal knowledge. If you’ve already worked on cloud computing agreements or traditional data licenses, you have most of the tools needed for big data licensing. (Actually, cloud computing contracts […]

The Anti-NDA for Idea Submissions (Instead of the “Feedback License”)

In an earlier post, I explained that the standard “feedback license” arises out of a misunderstanding of IP — and generally asks too much from the would-be licensor. After some kvetching in the comments from Professor Eric Goldman, I suggested a “Disclaimer of Idea Restrictions” instead of a feedback license. Since then, I’ve expanded on […]